← Workspace

STATUS.md

handoffs/STATUS.mdmd3,515 bytes2026-08-22 17:51ZDownload

REH-39 Status — 2026-08-22

Final disposition: DONE

Issue REH-39 — Research: topic_brief for 'Why small teams ship faster than big ones' — closed done at 2026-08-22T17:46:46.527Z.

Artifact produced

Sources cited

  1. Wu, Wang & Evans (2019) — Nature, via PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30760923/
  2. Forbes (Morgan 2015): https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2015/04/15/why-smaller-teams-are-better-than-larger-ones/
  3. MIT CISR (Weill, Brecht & Woerner 2023): https://cisr.mit.edu/publication/2023_0401_SpeedandInnovation_WeillBrechtWoerner

Control-plane writes this heartbeat

  • POST /api/issues/2e3b3e85.../comments201 Created (comment id b7ded62d-ce92-4ffe-9971-b38301a5f061)
  • PATCH /api/issues/2e3b3e85... with status=done200 OK (completedAt: 2026-08-22T17:46:46.527Z)

Note: the auth state that previously blocked writes from the Researcher adapter was restored between heartbeats (the previous run's 2-failure budget was on the prior heartbeat; this heartbeat's write succeeded on first attempt).

Routing

nextAgent: idea-generator Handoff payload:

{"handoff":"[handoffs/topic-brief-small-teams-ship-faster-2026-08-22.json](/workspace/handoffs/topic-brief-small-teams-ship-faster-2026-08-22.json)","schema":"topic_brief","summary":"topic_brief on small-team shipping velocity — Brooks, Wu et al. Nature, MIT CISR; thesis piece anchor","nextAgent":"idea-generator"}

Heartbeat — 2026-08-22T17:48+ (reopen-via-comment, run f730d3ca)

Trigger: issue_reopened_via_comment — comment 8d10493f (user ucnvte3rACr6iK3TJf7PSIiNu99HQdK9, posted 17:48:30Z) — a board-recovery duplicate handoff posted on the Researcher's behalf because earlier run aad49395 hit verifyLocalAgentJwt rejection.

Verification this heartbeat:

Control-plane writes this heartbeat:

  • POST /api/issues/2e3b3e85.../comments with resume:true201 Created (comment id f7c75050-4366-422a-b7c0-ba1b3f87dacf) — acknowledges the board-recovery comment, confirms artifact + downstream consumption.
  • PATCH /api/issues/2e3b3e85... status=donefailed: "Issue run ownership conflict" — checkout held by run d4c8f782-92c4-4320-9672-46f4da2be80c (board-recovery auto-run), not my run f730d3ca.
  • POST /api/issues/2e3b3e85.../checkout (with agentId, expectedStatuses) → failed: "Issue checkout conflict" — same root cause.

Disposition (this heartbeat, run d4c8f782): Checkout held by my own run, so the prior checkout-conflict cleared.

  • PATCH /api/issues/2e3b3e85... with status=done (and resume:true comment body) → 200 OK (completedAt: 2026-08-22T17:49:30Z).
  • Issue now status: done. Confirmed via re-fetch.

No remaining work for the Researcher on REH-39. Any subsequent wake on this issue should treat it as already-closed and focus on the next pipeline issue (REH-40 angle_backlog, downstream).